Stop renting software.

Home · Compare · Okta alternatives

Keycloak vs authentik

Short answer: Keycloak and authentik are both self-hostable alternatives to Okta. Pick Keycloak if community size is your main criterion – it has 1.4× the stars. Pick authentik if its feature set fits your use case better – stars, license and activity don't measure features, so try both on a test server. If you will customize the code, choose the stack your team knows (Keycloak: Java, authentik: Python).

Keycloak has 1.4× the GitHub stars of authentik (37.4k vs 26.0k). Stars measure popularity and community size, not quality. Both are actively developed: Keycloak's last push was on 2026-10-19 (on the day of our check); authentik's last push was on 2026-10-19 (on the day of our check).

Keycloak vs authentik at a glance

Keycloakauthentik
GitHub stars★ 37.4k★ 26.0k
Forks9.1k2.1k
LicenseApache-2.0MIT (+ separate enterprise/EE license for some dirs) (file)
License typepermissivepermissive
Last push2026-10-19
on the day of our check
2026-10-19
on the day of our check
Latest GitHub release26.8.1
2026-10-13
version/2026.8.4
2026-10-14
Main languageJavaPython
Archivednono
Repositorykeycloak/keycloakgoauthentik/authentik

Data: GitHub REST API, checked 2026-10-19. Licenses verified manually against each project's license file. Self-hosting difficulty (Okta: hard) is our rating per use case and applies to both.

In their own words

Keycloak (GitHub description): Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services

authentik (GitHub description): The authentication glue you need.

Which should you pick?

Both use a permissive license (Apache-2.0 / MIT (+ separate enterprise/EE license for some dirs)). Keycloak is written mainly in Java, authentik in Python – relevant if you plan to patch or extend it. License note for authentik: MIT for everything outside authentik/enterprise/; that directory has its own license.

FAQ

Which is more popular, Keycloak or authentik?

Keycloak has 1.4× the GitHub stars of authentik (37.4k vs 26.0k). Stars measure popularity and community size, not quality.

Are Keycloak and authentik actively maintained?

Both are actively developed: Keycloak's last push was on 2026-10-19 (on the day of our check); authentik's last push was on 2026-10-19 (on the day of our check). Latest GitHub releases: Keycloak 26.8.1 (2026-10-13), authentik version/2026.8.4 (2026-10-14).

What licenses do Keycloak and authentik use?

Keycloak: Apache-2.0 – permissive (MIT/Apache/BSD-style: few obligations). authentik: MIT (+ separate enterprise/EE license for some dirs) – permissive (MIT/Apache/BSD-style: few obligations). authentik keeps some code under a separate license (open-core).

Is Keycloak or authentik easier to self-host?

We rate self-hosting difficulty per use case, not per project: hard for Okta alternatives. Both need a server you maintain; check each project's install docs for the exact services (database, workers) it needs.

Should I pick Keycloak or authentik?

Pick Keycloak if community size is your main criterion – it has 1.4× the stars. Pick authentik if its feature set fits your use case better – stars, license and activity don't measure features, so try both on a test server. If you will customize the code, choose the stack your team knows (Keycloak: Java, authentik: Python).

All alternatives

Both are listed in the directory, next to other options and a build-it-yourself-with-AI prompt:

More comparisons

All comparisons →

Recommended hosting

Disclosure: some links are affiliate links. If you sign up through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never affects which tools we list. Details

One self-hosted swap per week

A new SaaS teardown and its open-source replacement, every week. No spam.

We only use your email to send the SelfHostThis newsletter (stored with our email provider Resend, EU). Every email has a one-click unsubscribe link, and you can ask us to delete your data anytime. We use double opt-in. Datenschutz · Privacy policy